Knowledge Hub / Clinical Research & Evidence

How to read a scientific study

A practical checklist for reading a paper, or a headline about one, like a scientist.

VALREXA Biosciences · 8 min read · November 2026

Key takeaways
  • Start with who or what was studied: cells, animals or people.
  • Check size, controls, randomization, blinding and the pre-registered main outcome.
  • Look at absolute numbers, funding and whether the result has been replicated.

The anatomy of a paper

SectionWhat to look for
AbstractA summary. Useful, but it often leaves out limitations.
IntroductionThe question and why it matters.
MethodsThe most important section: who was studied, how, and what was measured.
ResultsThe actual numbers, tables and figures.
DiscussionThe authors’ interpretation, including limitations.
Funding and conflicts of interestWho paid for the work and who might benefit.

The ten-question checklist

  1. Who or what was studied? Cells, animals or humans? Healthy volunteers or patients?
  2. How many? Small studies are more likely to produce chance findings.
  3. Was there a control group? Without one, you can’t tell what would have happened anyway.
  4. Was it randomized and blinded?
  5. What was the main outcome, and was it chosen in advance? Check the trial registration. Switching outcomes after the fact is a red flag.
  6. Was the outcome meaningful? A change in a blood marker is not the same as people living longer or feeling better.
  7. How big was the effect? Look for absolute differences, not just percentages. See Statistics that matter.
  8. How long did it last? Short studies can miss late benefits and late harms.
  9. Who funded it? Industry funding doesn’t make a study wrong, but it is worth knowing.
  10. Has it been replicated? One study is a starting point. Check whether independent groups found the same thing.

Preprints, peer review and retractions

A preprint is posted before peer review and may change. Peer review is a quality check, not a guarantee. Papers are sometimes retracted for errors or misconduct; the Retraction Watch Database tracks them.

Reading headlines

Ask: was this in mice? Is it a correlation? What was the actual size of the effect? Many “breakthrough” stories describe early animal or cell results. Our guide to misleading health claims covers the most common tricks.

Further reading

  1. PubMed User Guide
  2. Retraction Watch Database
  3. Book: How to Read a Paper (Greenhalgh), on our reading list

These are authoritative background resources rather than citations to a specific experimental finding. This guide is educational, not medical advice, and does not endorse the use of experimental compounds.

Put your understanding to work

Choose a next step, at your own pace.